Daniel The Techonomista: 2010

Friday, November 12, 2010

The Top Secret Economic Boom of Generation Z

March 30 1999, the Dow Industrial Average passed 10000 for the first time. Late August/Early September 2010 the Dow Industrial Average passed 10000 half a dozen times. The Nasdaq in the same period has been cut roughly in half. The recent Census finds that 1 in 7 Americans, the most since the 1960s, are now living in poverty. Not just dull manufacturing jobs have been shipped overseas, but a hoard of IT and Customer Service too.

My generation shouldn't have a rosy view of the economy. We came of employment age when the dot-com bubble burst and graduated from college in the midst of the sub-prime-mortgage-turned-credit-turned-financial-turned-economic crisis. As Napster morphed to Soulseek to Limewire to iTunes and bitTorrent we all realized we were the first generation since the era of Ragtime that would not have "rock" stars, just professional musicians barely living off of the long-tail economy. Waiters, some nurses, doorman, stock brokers, human resources departments and a whole host of other professional and not-so-professional positions will be held by robots within 12 years. Many of us have five or six digits worth of student debt. Most of us live with our parents. Most of our parents only significant savings is in the form of home-ownership and hordes of them are getting foreclosed on. Those that haven't seen foreclosure have seen shriveled net worth and credit limits. The list of negative Dust-Bowl-sounding gloom and doom items is endless.

And yet we feel like millionaires. All of us. As long as we can reach the critical salary mass to afford a fast computer, broadband, a mobile computing device and an unlimited data plan. Why? Because all we ever wanted was information and now information is free. Don't get me wrong, we still have a couple of stragglers whose greatest wishes include SUVs and fine wines and other things that are impossible (at least today) to transmit via 0s and 1s. Pound for pound though, we are a people whose interest is media and increasingly so.

Remember the late 1990s? Remember the money you spent on media? I had a friend (a high school student working in Pizza Hut, mind you) who bought about $10,000 worth of CDs in 1998 from ColombiaHouse. I remember planning on taking two summer jobs, one day and one night with about a half-hour of leisure budgeted daily when I was in 9th grade with the sole purpose of buying the ultimate collection of DVDs. A hot CD in 1999, like Juvenile's 400 Degreez or that Santana record that got played to death (think Rob "Matchbox 20" Thomas and that Maria, Maria song) sold for about 18.99 or more at your local mall. The graver robbery was the singles, 5 to 7.99 to get the hit, the remix of the hit and the probable next single (provided the test groups give it the go). Movies, forget about it! I lost my cousin's VHS copy of "Jerry Maguire" in 1997 and my dad made me pay over half my life savings, 22.97 to replace it. Renting a movie from Blockbuster for 3 days nearly cost $6.

Flash-forward to 2010. I've got stations like Pandora and LastFM that generate music based algorithms to please my most particular favorite traits, be the variables mood, chronological, genre, tempo or instrumentation. I even start BlackHat Pandora accounts with the sole purpose of bending the station to playing the songs I want. Via a few well placed BookMarks and ThumbsUp I have a station that plays just The Strokes three records and assorted singles, about 57.97 worth of value in 1998 dollars. File-sharing is inconceivably various , so I can peer-to-peer with best friends, go to sites, swap Flash drives, share over a common wi-fi or even just bump smartphones. High-speed internet means pirates can get their hands on whatever movies they want and get them fast. It also means those people in the street who used to sell $10 copies of crummy hand-held-captured films now sell $5 high-def BlueRay discs and carry portable players so you can check for Quality Assurance before purchase. A $20 Netflix subscription lets you stream endless content in 30-odd languages and order two physical discs at a time from a nearly universal catalogue.

If the quantitative facts about changes in media are so significant, it's really shocking to sit back and feel the qualitative ones as well. YouTube means anyone can put up content anytime, anywhere. File-sharing means artists like Mos Def and The Strokes can be some of the defining artists of early 2000s without ever really getting heard on the radio. The Bed Intruder phenomenon was an incredible rebuff to the record industry. The greatest hit of the summer of 2010 was a clip from the news auto-tuned by some brothers and ensuing ocean of multi-genre covers of the auto-tuned news clip. The funniest things of our generation aren't sitcoms or standup or variety shows but YouTube classics like Greatest Cry Ever and David After Dentist.

As monumental as all that is, its really just information we used to store in physical objects like tapes and CDs made digital. More interestingly, now even processes are becoming digital or at least partially so, and therefore depreciating as well. Dating, for instance, remains a process in which it is virtually impossible to avoid all costs. Yet hope is not lost. Dating Services, with their broad connectivity and matching algorithms, serve to eliminate those frequent dating experiments with no ROI. Facebook, 4square, Google Latitude, Yelp's Monocle and other location-based services help create the kind of coordination and environmental knowledge that makes dining, partying or getting a haircut much more successful endeavors.

My personal favorite is the OpenCourseWare. Since I was about 11 I've seen the tragic look on people's faces when they find out they can't attend a particular university. I saw a kid cry when his mom told him he couldn't go to MIT and I saw a coworker at a Fortune 10 banking institution crushed when he received word neither of the Ivy-League MBA's he'd applied to had accepted him. Those who do settle for universities on their budget constraint line while seriously yearning for a superior system can develop misanthropic habits and miss out on majors ill-explained to them. At best, they waste a lot of money just for a diploma and sign a contract for a much higher lifetime opportunity cost of networking. I don't think I even have to talk about high schools.

OpenCourseWare amends so much of this. August 24th, CNET reported iTunes U's 300 millionth download. That's about as many university lectures downloaded as there are American citizens. I've personally felt the power of this. I majored in Spanish Linguistics and Economics in college, thinking that knowing Linguistics and Economics while also speaking Spanish was the best I could do with my life, my budget, my time constraints and those of college programs. I went to City University of New York, A) because it's the most esteemed public university in America (Gordon Gekko, Andy Grove and Colin Powell went there) and B) because in most other states people (like employers) get the weird impression that you went to NYU when you say City University of New York and it's not lying if your response is always, "NYU is a great school".

Needless to say, I felt cheated. I felt abused by market forces. I felt like I got felt up by Adam's Smith's invisible hand. I wanted to be a Computer Science Major at Stanford. I wanted to study Philosophy at Harvard. I wanted to study Linguistics at MIT. And I wanted to do them all at once. By working and not taking a loan I didn't even have a schedule that would permit me to study Engineering at CUNY. I was jealous of the rich and my envy hurt me. I kept my bitterness inside as I noticed quickly that bringing up class's correlation with success is not appreciated in conversation, especially amongst the successful. I soon learned I wasn't alone though. I heard my suspicions echoed in offices and bars and publics places of all kinds. I realized most people were dissatisfied with their college education and the few that had nothing to complain of their school generally filled that void in conversation by ruminating on their tremendous debt.

Then one day Google saved my educational life. I was watching YouTube, cruising through some programming tutorials, a recent discovery of mine, jumping from C++ to Python, and Primitive Operators to Lists. Great short tutorials that taught me about the syntax of computer programming languages but not great sources for contemplating the spectacularity of their possibilities. See a three-minute video on an implementation of a simple list and realizing how to type it correctly such that you get the data structure is nothing like the truly incredible consequences lists can have on your life. What I really needed was a conceptual tour of the key ideas of software building. One day I was prompted to a page of one of the true-content producers of YouTube, this guy named thenewboston, who has around 955 tutorials (as of 9/22/10) in multiple languages, most under ten minutes, perfect for median-intelligence people and great for above-intelligence folks new to programming who know how to fast-forward tactfully and realize when the guy is just mumbling incoherently. Gazing momentarily rightward, in my YouTube Suggestions I caught sight of a blackboard, a man and the words MIT. The mouse attacked for me:

I discovered MIT's Intro to Computer Science, one of the most ample offerings in OpenCourseWare. This MIT course includes 24 lecture videos, 2 Complete Texts, Selections of Others, Assignments and Exams. People are now even forming informal study groups so they can execute the class socially. Although much OpenCourseWare is of this par of completeness just seeing the videos never hurts either. The most charming, effective teacher I've ever known is Mehren Sahami doing Programming Methodology at Stanford whose videos I recommend to people of all ages, seriously entertaining by force of his tremendous personality to watch as though it were a sitcom about learning JAVA. I've taken Computer Science, Mathematics and Economics Courses at Stanford, Harvard, MIT, CMU and UC Berkeley. I sat through graduation speeches by both Steve "the Ninja" Jobs and Bill "the Borg" Gates.

The democratizing element of OpenCourseWare is a great social thing in the industrial world, but when it hits the third world things will never be the same again. When broadband and tablets become cheap enough for distribution throughout the poorest of the nations (within 3-5 years) the endogenous growth functions attributable to the percentage of the population involved in STEM fields of those countries are going to explode. Countries that never so much as had a research facility will suddenly be teaming with experts in Physics, Information Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering. It is a note of national pride for Americans that we've innovated nearly everything (with a little help from Europe) over the past 200 years. What most people don't realize is that losing our technological edge is not absolutely negative. Imagine you're diagnosed with Lung Cancer….will you care that the cure was invented in China? You lose your leg in accident…is it relevant enough to worry that it's bionic replacement is product of Indian Engineers?

The etymology of the OpenSource Movement (and a frequently-heard phrase of its exponents) is that it's "free as in free speech, not free as in free beer". I beg to differ. As automation progressively takes care of all our animal needs and bioinformatics our health, people will continue to create meaningful content without ever occurring to them that they should monetize it. This utopian day may be very far away but as consumers that doesn't really matter to us, as long as people are willing to distribute content for ad revenue from businesses. It's a beautiful thought that people someday would create content to inspire, inform and educate other people. It's a beautiful life we live in today, in 2010, because our inspiration, information and education is largely being subsidized by businesses chasing super-specified ad revenue enabled by companies like Google and Facebook.

I close with a crude-back-of-the-napkin-calculation. In 1998-dollars I'm making hundreds of thousands of dollars just living. Not everyone can be as lucky as me. If some people had such a large stipend, they might spend it on other things like wine and women. I luckily, would spend it all on content anyways, content as data, content as information and content as knowledge. The first two are nearly always free and the third is getting there. On the other hand, I don't pirate much at all, just make due with manipulating the legal distribution channels so I'm sure there's some regular Joes, some store clerks and some Government Assisted-Living people out there pulling in as much as millions of yearly media-salary.

I run through 6-8 films a week. At 5.68 1998 Blockbuster dollars, that's $~2000 in income a year. As I almost only watch documentaries and foreign films and would certainly have to resort to buying (and some cases spending significant time searching for) some, I apply a premium and multiply it times 1.25, to 2500 of 1998 Video Content Dollars. Musical Albums I love. With age I've grown and lost some of the ritualistic attachments American teenagers develop with pop music. When programming, writing, studying or researching I like to find an album that is just pleasing enough to play from start to finish. Since I do these four activities many of my waking hours, I'm consuming at least 4 albums a day (if the outlier super-music filled weekends are counted and the fact that music I consume mutually with friends was probably obtained freely too (unless by those saints who actually buy songs on iTunes)). Some are certainly popular enough to cost the $18.99 in popular 1998 album dollars, some not-popular enough to cost less and yet some so unpopular in a physical object market like that of Compact Discs to cost a lot more so we'll make the price of a CD 17 in 1998 dollars. Assuming music was a simple as listening to albums from start to finish, I'd have had to have budgeted $24,820 strictly to the purchase of LP discs. Of course, when I feel like I need to be inspired and just look the song up on YouTube, when I leverage the fact that Android FroYo on my htc Evo 4G has Flash so I can go to any number of music-vendor sites that let you listen to whole songs for free without purchase, when I stream some artist's I love/hate's new single to sample, when I consider that Pandora is often turning me on to songs I'd never have discovered with 1998 radio I'm buying like 10 1998 singles a day. That's another 23500. The 2010 GDP per capita of the United States is about 46,400. The mean-American earner would be stuck with about a $5000 deficit after buying as much 1998-priced media as I do. I assumed he'd be hard-pressed having a good time and getting a good education. I wasn't. I don't keep accurate enough books to tell you how much money I've blown in bars and restaurants but I live in Manhattan, New York and I'm sure with 4Square, Facebook, Twitter, Google Maps, Yelp, a Smartphone and the assurance that everyone I know has one too, I'm saving myself at least 8 spend-a-lot-of-money-yet-have-no-fun-nights who in Manhattan often cost at least 100 before you realize you got to take that cab home (another 20 bucks), so right there you have it, I earn the entire GDP per-capita seated and then some in front of a screen in leisure activities.

Saved Educational expenditures probably more than double my content-income as I doubt I have to remind remind you that taking 12 classes at 5 Ivy League Schools this year probably dwarfs all the opportunity cost dollars I just laid out in the last paragraph...

Great Natural Language Processing Videos

Practical Applications of NLP

Speech Recognition and Retrieval

Incremental Bayesian Networks

The Next Generation in Neural Networks

Using Evolution to Design Artificial Inteligence

Bay Area NLTK User Group

Google Wave and NLP

Google Python Class: Regular Expressions

Machine Learning and Machine Translation

Machine Learning @ Stanford

Knowledge-Based Information Retrieval with Wikipedia

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Let's Outsource Reading

Dear Friends,

I love to read. You love to read. Why not? A novel is great experience. You live in it. You feel it. It becomes you. You become its author or characters or mood. The words in the book become the words that you come to define your life with and the very nature of your life changes because of the semantic meaning embedding in everything you see or do.

Sometimes though, we are forced to read against our will. We are made to extract meaning from texts we have no intention of loving. Worse yet, even if we love the books we are obligated to read, how are we realistically expected to emerge from it's reading with some objective idea of its plot, its language and its moral when its plot is endlessly assaulted by our subjective memories of life and media representing life, it's language assaulted by our idea of language and its moral assaulted by our generally-firmly-established moral compasses?

Any of us in high school or college know the pain of being forced to read novels we would never have read. Worse still many teachers in the "liberal arts" don't grade based on execution but based on the size of the intersection of their ideology and the student's. Now if you can cull a few key phrases from your teacher you can interpret a book according to their ideology without every having to abandon your own!

Those of us in the world of non-matriculated adults wish we could feign a knowledge of books to impress coworkers, possible romantic mates, etc. The opportunity cost of a book is roughly a week's salary, nearly $1,000 if you are the average American. Would you like 40 hours and/or $1,000?

There are also those of you who love to read but for whom reading isn't enough. You read a book five times and then you read all the existing criticism of it yet you still wish you could decipher the nexus of this book more. Well my friend, I can help you apply the same exactitude Mechanical Engineers or Investment Bankers apply to their respective crafts with a cornucopium of tools you never imagined could be applied to literature.

A quick demonstration: Let's say you had to read "A Tale of 2 Cities" by Charles Dickens. Why you just paste the url of a website containing the book's text into my prebuilt function like so:

Please tell me the website containing the text you wish to analyze:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/98/98-h/98-h.htm

Having pasted in the address of Project Gutenberg's free copy of the book the program outputs a series of facts with which one could easily create arguments for an essay with perhaps just the assistance of the book's description on the back. There is no doubt that the aid of just the introduction or CliffNotes would be more than enough to proceed with this output to an incredible and insightful essay on the even the graduate level.

A few interesting characteristics:

The first output is that of collocations, or simply the most common two-word combinations of words in the book. This is a great tool for figuring out main characters and combined with a little Google can really help you decipher character development in a cinch. Also some of the non Proper Noun combos can be extremely telling of the plot.

The 100 most common two word sets in the book are:
Building collocations list
Mr. Lorry; Miss Pross; Madame Defarge; Mr. Cruncher; Saint Antoine; Doctor Manette; said Mr.; Charles Darnay; young lady; Mr. Stryver; Mr. Lorry.; Miss Manette;Jacques Three; Sydney Carton; Young Jerry; Miss Pross.; Old Bailey; said Miss; Gutenberg-tm electronic; n't know; one another; honest tradesman; electronic works;Archive Foundation; Mr. Darnay; Mr. Barsad; Monsieur Defarge; Temple Bar; golden hair; thousand seven; Mrs. Cruncher; seven hundred; Jarvis Lorry; Monsieur Gabelle; Mr. Carton; long time; Mr. Attorney-General; Good day; last night; Doctor Manette.; Madame Defarge.; electronic work; set forth; blue cap; Tellson 's.; North Tower

The limit to this function is your hunger for two-word combos. I have set it to 100 for demonstration purposes. You could set it to 1 or 1000.

Let's move on to some other significant output:

Words used in similar contexts to monstrous are

Building word-context index...
big blameless certainly complete early easily exactly familiar far
final freely good heavily here ignorant impracticable late litter
little long

Here you can toss a word in and see all the other words in the text that appear in a similar syntactic position of the sentence to that of your word and follow or are followed by the same or similar words. This tool can be very useful for breaking down an author's style, or perhaps even analyzing the speeches of a political leader or CEO. Applying it to Pride and Prejudice for example, we find the word 'monstrous' for Jane Austen had the same sense as 'very' or 'extremely'. Please note that 'monstrous' was a demonstration pick and you can use any word of your choice.

The lexical diversity score of the book is: 11

The lexical diversity is the total number of words divided by the number of unique words in the text, the smaller the number the greater variety used by the author. Nearly no books have scores under 8 or 9 (it would be hard to get a book out saying "the" just once so you can consider that range of "Slightly Below Ten" as extremely diverse. Other great ways to apply it are to compare one author to others from their period or the book in question of the author with his other works. Perhaps the "young" books of the author are filled with more lexical diversity as his/her primary concern was dazzling the world with his/her incredible and perplexing descriptions. Perhaps the "old" books of the author exhibit low lexical diversity because now plot, character development and meaning have grown to take center stage in the work and now words are used like motifs in symphony, repeating throughout the text so as to create a definitive belief system without every explicitly stating it. These claims are big, but with quantitatively sound lexical diversity measures you can at least dare to make them without your teacher responding with his "instant-write-off-ability" powers.

Now imagine you're reading "Great Expectations" but you saw your teacher at the video store once with an Obama shirt on and a copy of "Steal This Movie: The Life of Abbie Hoffman" in his hand, walking by his desk once you saw a thick tome of Karl Marx's "Kapital" and his hybrid auto has a Dennis Kucinich bumper sticker. Let's be real. Unless he is an incredibly detached and objective person - fairly rare in this world - writing a paper that interprets GreatEx from the perspective that Adam Smith's Invisible Hand and Reagan's Supply-Side Economics is not going to get you an A.

Instead you can develop a thesis dealing with Dickens' Marxist side manifesting itself through uses of the words "poverty" and "justice" throughout the work. But how to know them all without reading it? Boom:

The word injustice occurs in these contexts:
Building index...
Displaying 8 of 8 matches:
ock at my Lord Chief justice himself , and pulled
ge of the Lord Chief justice in the Court of King
s , the Tribunals of justice , and all society (
believe it. I do you justice ; I believe it. " Hi
love of Heaven , of justice , of generosity , of
er of death , to his justice , honour , and good
love of Heaven , of justice , of generosity , of
mind to impeach the justice of the Republic. She
None

the word poverty occurs in these contexts:
Displaying 7 of 7 matches:
ed the air , even if poverty and deprivation had
abandoned her in her poverty for evermore , with
ave repented them in poverty and obscurity often
ations as their bare poverty yielded , from their
in their children , poverty , nakedness , hunger
ss of twenty , whose poverty and obscurity could
n the south country. poverty parted us , and she

Naturally you can modify the amount of the words surrounding your search-word, asking for just a handful of them to get a few stylistic details or thousands at a time to get the whole page of excerpt featuring the search-word in question.

What about all those sources you need to quote? Building a critical background for your essay is as easy as applying to the same search method to the Journal Articles you've thrown in your bibliography. Do a quick run-through on "poverty"/"justice" in a handful of articles and you'll have the framework of an critical literary essay worthy of Harper's without ever having read the book nor the criticism you're quoting!

In the starter kit program I have provided these few key operations you can perform on a text. I know hundreds more. Their output is not simply in the form of sentences and word lists but even graphs and charts or useful functions like search. You can plot the fifty most used words in a text, do pie charts of word ratios to each other, or comb through thousands of pages with an algorithm much faster than the 'command f' you've been living by.

This program with the output above (legitimately enough for an essay writing) is on sale for only eight dollars. I can also give you hour training/support sessions for 50$. We can do as many such sessions are you desire to learn or my knowledge on Natural Language Processing provides. Or you can just pick some of the aforementioned other methods and I will add them to the code for you just 4 dollars each (price negotiable as number of other methods passes 10). Your choice.

We let computers free of us childish basic arithmetic, algebra, geometry and statistics years ago and we proceeded to an incredible degree of understanding of the maths and sciences. Who would really believe then that we can't eliminate some of the more shallow reading functions and come away with more profound knowledge of texts?

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

What's Popping in Tech September 22nd?

AppleTV to be Pretty Setbox, Google TV to be Great System

Dave McClure Goes Bonkers Over/Explains the Super-Angel Investor Conspiracy

TechCrunch Compares Verizon's Android Marketplace to the Matrix

The AI Personal Assistant Has Arrived, and His Name is Priority Inbox

Who's Ready to Cry/Throw Up? RIMM Blackpad may drop "any day"

iPad in China...boldly going where the iPhone only managed to flop

Idea Management @ Nielson

Graphing Google's Shopping Spree

Great...after criticizing QCOM management when it traded in the 30s, Cramer suddenly thinks it's the main Droid beneficiary @ 43.51

Not only will you help map human proteomes, you get a great screensaver

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Death to Poets

Having loved writing indecipherable, surrealistic poems as a youth and remembering how little effort was really needed in their composition, I decided recently to write a poetry virus of sorts that would automatically generate such texts.

The Algorithm is more or less this:

1) Generate Text (This is the easiest. Using the .generate() method of the Natural Language Toolkit for Python you can generate texts of any desired length. They are n-gram generated, so that words will be followed by words based on the percentage that they follow them in real life. Hence, if "whale" follows "the" 30% of the time in Moby Dick, "whale" ought be generated after 30% of "the"s in your generation. NLTK comes with a series of readily manipulable parsed and tagged texts but you can go off and parse/tag one of your own if you think this exercise would be more exciting with a Kerouac or Phillip K. Dick novel instead of one of the 8 or 9 they supply you with.)

2) Cut into Lines

A) Create Monte Carlo number generator n<=14

B) Cut to n words

3) White Spaces

A) Create Monte Carlos number generator n < 6

B) Assign n tab distribution across screen

4) Save to Word

5) E-mail to Poetry Publishing Sites

I was sincerely ready to create the whole system and become the most-published poet in history in a couple of days but I thought in doing so I was creating a huge disservice to people like Rimbaud and Whitman et al.

At any rate, here's one of my Cyber-Poems, "Ahab"

Moby Dick was

fairly sighted

from the hills .-- But the truth , the

very buttons of his bodily woes ,

but by some experienced whaleman .

After many similar hair - breadth escapes , -we ' ll be ready for it in two!-

-- that brawny doer of rejoicing good deeds was wholly ignorant

of the horizon , like a wild set of mariners.

But how fair ?

Fair for death ;

how he lords it over the world!

, so that when several ships are but subtile deceits ,

not only to be no hearts above the

common sperm whale ' s turn .

the Leviathan that crooked serpent ; and nailed to her

highness a prodigious sensation in all his persecutions ; bethinking

it -- now over the head ,

and therefore

to ye , ye mates , seeking repose within six inches of his Captain

to mind the regular features

of his Dutch whale fleet to be

susceptible to atmospheric distension and contraction . If ye see ,

that thinking after all was caused by an awful question .

................
It's certainly not a good poem, I realize that. What makes me proud though is that I'd throw it in about 85th percentile of modern surrealist poems in terms of quality. So, I beg you to ask yourself, if surrealist poems are generally terrible anyways, instead of trying to improve them, why not just automate the process of their composition? They will continue to be horrible, only now humans can spend more time writing prose, studying engineering and uploading YouTube videos.....

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Augmented Reality @ Google Zeitgeist

Augmented Reality Plus a Couple of Other Great 7-10 Minute Speeches from the Geniuses over at Google Zeitgeist.

Watch minutes 3:40 to 19:59 to hear Maarten Lens-Fitzgerald of Layar. Also immediately download Layar if you have an Android and/or >=iPhone 3GS.

Andreas Dengel on Text 2.0 from 19.60 to 26.18 is a delight as well.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Employee of the Month in the Era of Augmented Reality

The Alpha Male/Female/GenderAmbiguous of the 21st century business is about to undergo a revolution. While much of the Social Networking Web 2.0 stuff hitting the office is causing true revolutions in synergy and productivity it doesn't do much to impact the current Machiavellian orders of office politics. Knowing the right names, talking to people the right way, passive aggressiveness and chess-like strategy are still essential. All these current (and longstanding) real-life processes just start to take up so much more typing, Facetime, Cisco technology and bandwidth.

Politics will always matter. I'm not going to stand on a podium and tell you that just because we are undergoing a revolution in man/machine interface that suddenly "who has the best ideas/can execute ideas of others" is going to trump who's the "coolest guy to have a beer with/the hot-smart-aggressive girl". The possibility of that trumping occurring though, is going to increase significantly.

We all remember PreCalculus and how we learned that we can add two functions, say f(x) and g(x). Well, success in business, particularly when business means working under others in a business hierarchy as it so often means, is largely the result of two functions, where f(x) is your ability to execute short and long term objectives and g(x) how much you please those around you/who your family is/how cheery you are/how much you understand the dynamics of team play.

These functions are then weighted, based on the nature of your business. Businesses like IBM, Microsoft, Google, Zynga and Facebook obviously are looking for a higher weighted f(x) execution-pool than Wynn Resorts, a host of mutual funds, and nearly every Mom-And-Pop store on Earth, whom are weighing more g(x).

Of course we live in a world that elected George W. Bush twice. People loathe Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein for quantifying and avoiding obvious risk the world was willingly blind not to see. The Great Steve Jobs got fired from Apple. No office, sector or environment, big or small, tech-centric, sales-centric, marketing-centric, long-tail, short-tail or state-sponsored is putting more emphasis on f(x) than g(x). Let's go nuts and say the global aggregate weight average is something like .20(f(x)) + .8(g(x)). (Caveat Emptor: The United States probably is a lot more execution-centric than the global function as in places like Latin America and Eurasia you can often become a huge success without producing anything of value at all).

Well Augmented Reality is about to drastically change the weights. Augmented Reality, the great democratizer of the Social Web World. The hotshot at the office will still be the guy with assiduously combed hair who gets on well with all the female associates and the CFO's nephew will still pool incredible projects out of non-effort magically at deadline time. We will still be human beings with human tastes and preferences, after all. Only now they're going to have to share the spotlight with two new archetypes, (really three as a sections of both archetypes share a large Venn diagram-style intersection), the Passionate Video-Game Enthusiast and the Fanatic Mathematics Hobbyist.

Both of these types have always been tremendous executers and have gotten on fairly well in office environments. They're scattered across all departments from Operations to Sales although their mecca seems to be IT. Their f(x) has always been so high that it's overridden their poor g(x) complement. Until now though, f(x) has not generated returns valid enough to warrant increasing its weight. Also, due to the vertical nature of information and the still-persistent Machiavellian environment of the office, their poor g(x) actually hinders their potential f(x) as they never quite know where to turn on large floors or who to talk to about what and their interlocutors consistently prize diffusing the immediate situation of their contact more than finding an optimal solution to their mutual problem.

Augmented Reality promises to change all that. I present to you David, my theoretical protagonist. Obsessed as a youth with Rubix cubes, rabidly happy in his undergraduate Logic and Algorithms classes, Sim City trained to calculate derivatives on spot to specific amortizable time-oriented objectives he's gotten a job as an Associate to a Wealth Advisor (aka Broker with Rich Friends last century) at the Private Bank of some anonymous large New York Bank.

Although David seems to execute trades across various financial instruments for various clients over various distributions of accounts with ease and preciseness he's looked-on a bit as an oddball amongst the varied 60 or so Associates on the floor and although his productivity is in the range of the top eight Associates, he's generally valued by the floor managers and HR folks as much closer to the median. Points against him include irrelevant topics like, "He's not that fun to talk to in the elevator" and "He eats lunch alone playing with his iPad". Although nobody physically says it, they all find it spooky how it subscribes to the Financial Times to read it, not use it as cute fashion accoutrement. As an intern rotating advisor to advisor, he'd almost been ruled out after the first couple of weeks due to his odd laconic conversational style and public school background. Only his ability to calculate all kinds of Bach-like variations on options and dual-currency notes had saved him.

Well in in the spring of 2012 the IT department declares that they've finally set up a great AR system and a really nonintrusive set of normal-looking glasses you can implement it with. Suddenly you can run through clients doing all kinds of great search variations and even invent your own search algorithms, doing menial tasks like paying off American Express Cards for rich families you only want around to sell huge portions of Latin american debt to can be automated with a few simple precise if/then statements and while loops. The employee phonebook gives you key personal talk-time information about each of your contacts as all of them have been asked to fill out a survey about personal tastes and gustos so while you work out a revolving loan with Ralph from Credit for a a family of Scottish architects currently living in a high-risk country in South America you are prompted to bring up the Dodgers (his favorite team) or Frank Sinatra (his favorite singer) whenever you reach information bottlenecks too large to keep talking about the business-task-subject while too small to warrant calling back to resolve later.

David takes to the new changes like a fish in water. Even Ralph later comments to Peggy from HR that he thinks "my man lil' Davey" is finally getting some serious action in the bedroom because talking to him is like talking to a new man. Only possible explanation for such a huge, great change, claims Ralph. Peggy makes a mental note on with virtual sticky widget placed in the upper right hand corner of her vision-field to investigate later.

David starts to come up with great ideas. He automates client-alert processes on great investments by creating a machine-written newsletter that advises on three-week trading trends on ETFs tracking major indices powered by a semantic parser that combs Reuters and AP newlines for key sentiment-phrases. When he does trades with foreign language clients he uses an automatic translation system that would cost him significant time on account of constraints in live-time translation due to the ambiguity of phrases if he wasn't really just using it to mask the fact that the image of him in the telecommunication feed is just an earlier video he made smilingly making mouth motions on loop. In reality he's juggling a loan to a real estate mogul in Honk Kong, selling a derivative that shorts the S&P 500 3x to a graphic designer in Colombia and getting a Bengali Fishing Company Magnate to load up on GOOG shares before they release their new Google Maps Integration Suit that lets you physically explore 3D simulations of foreign continents and have business conferences on top of Mount Rushmore.

Carol, his arch-nemesis is climbing the corporate sentiment ranks by networking at parties and bars all over midtown Manhattan and Upper East Side. He's quickly catching her by networking with data structures and algorithms central to daily and/or high-return processes.

Soon, John Wu, the head honcho of the floor has a talk with Irene Bellanotte, the Wealth Advisor that David has been working under for the last 18 months.

"He's just too valuable Irene. I know he's made you a lot of money and you have compensated him justly with the increasing returns but the potential he has to automate the office and train the other Associates is just too great. This isn't coming from me. It's coming from the men upstairs. They've created a new position for him, in fact, given his multitasking prowess they've given him two. He's Vice President of AR integration on the floor full-time and will consult as Automation Architect throughout the company periodically."

David is but an isolated case. The consequences could be much greater. Great adapters, the kind of people who speak two languages, play three instruments and delight at taking new, even lower-paying jobs occasionally for the sole purpose of challenging their ability to change their skill set will become like East Hampton's Timeshares for great companies. Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Apple and Asus will share some great Operations expert three months a year, cut up to the smallest distributions possible where said great employee can effectively execute given that he has the ability to instantly comb and manipulate gigantic portions of information (as opposed to data, what he would have to comb through and with difficulty attempt to manipulate today).

Pilots and Soliders will have Cartesian planes laid over their eyes and manipulable targets that move based on complex environmental-factor modeling software. Children will have tutors with graphical demonstrations and trial problems that respond immediately to key issues they cannot grasp. Lonely people will have lovers. Husbands and wives will work on separate continents without considering theirs a long-term relationship. You will never be lost in another city for as long as you live. When storage becomes sufficiently cheap, and storage is becoming cheaper faster than anything else in technology, you will be able to videorecord your entire life and spot search to remember forgotten phrases, faces, names and passwords.

Social Networks will revolutionize the idea of "being social" in so as far as changing the scale and possibilities of what is considered "being social." Augmented Reality will change the very parameters with which we define "being social". Social Networks are changing the domain and resultant range of our function but Augmented Reality will change the formula of the function itself. In the real world of love and entertainment we'll adapt as easily and thoughtlessly as we have to any great upheaval, but in the too-big-to-fail world of large corporations born of the 20th century where Homo Economicus meets Vito Corleone and everything is fair if you do it with a cheerful attitude things are going to be flipped on their ears. If the business environment was a TV show, today it'd probably be the "The Office" but in the world of Augmented Reality it will be some new show that feels like a mix of equal parts "The Matrix", "Inception", and "Tron."

Virtual Reality was a fantasy of long-dead losers with no imagination and no glimpse of the tech specs. The real revolution is Augmented Reality. Rappers is the 90s were fond of the phrase "Get yo' head right." Soon Kanye West will have a song climbing the iTunes download charts called "Get Yo' Headset Right".

Top Fifty Business Books

Whip out your Kindle, iPad, Nook or Streak and start reading Bloomberg's Top Fifty Business Books of the Year.

Augmented Reality on Bloomberg Innovators

Not only did Bloomberg surprisingly hire MTV news alum Tabitha Soren, they did a great special on Augmented Reality on Innovators.

Bloomberg Special on AR

Augmented Reality is the technology that will be nascent during our current late Smartphone/early Tablet phrase, but will truly come to beautiful fruition during the late Tablet/early Headset-Glasses Stage.

This is a longshot call not 100% related to the post, but I want it on record that I believe the first commercially viable Augmented Reality headset will be a post-iPad product from Apple called iGlasses.

Friday, September 17, 2010

Tech News September 17th

The Steve Jobs Ninja Saga Continues

iPad hits China...and a bunch of Latin American nations WSJ doesn't deem worth mentioning....

Custom Google Tronz for Biznesses

Computing pi to Ridiculous Inconceivable Preciseness with Cloud Computers

The Skinny on RIMM

HALO: Shoot 'em up at it's best

Keep the Bipedal Robots Coming

Kurzweil Strikes Back!

Diaspora? Bugs already?

Students Bill of Rights 2.0

Mid-twenties and wanting a Master's or a Doctorate, I have a checklist of things universities have to do before I go for the big diploma.

All Online: I want to be able to go to a school in Russia or Argentina, or an Ivy League American while I happen to be working in Russia or Argentina. Hell, I want to go to a school in hometown New York, I just don't want to brave the subway there and have the right to attend class in my pajamas.

Interactive Courseware: I'm not talking about a video lecture of some guy and a . pdf textbook. I want a powerpoint of all the lecture points, but I just don't want photos and text. I want it to include graphs I can manipulate. I want my textbook to have embedded malleable diagrams, short relevant video segments, periodic Likert-Scale ratings of my comfortability with the text. I want multiple chances to do problems and a intuitive pedagogical trouble-shooting system that gets what I don't. I'll go so far as to say that I even demand a video game based on core course concepts.

As Social As Real Life: I want to be able to attend classes naked, smoking a joint and eating some oatmeal on my day off, but that doesn't mean I don't want to make meaningful connections with people in my field of study. I want a micro-Facebook/Twitter/Youtube/Facetime meets the University where I can get significant help and collaboration from my peers. I want to know them and I want them to know me.

F*** Paper! I've bought thousands of textbooks, I've carried hundred-pound bags around complicated urban environments, I've endured thousands of papercuts, I'm a green person, I'm a….do I have to go on? I don't want to deal with paper, got it??!?!

Sex, Lies and Streaming-Video Smartphones

Web analytics firms have been getting wild lately, associating trends with operating systems. They assert, for instance that while iOS users have more pet fish, Android-users go harder for birds. They make male/female distributions over RIMM's Blackberry OS, Palm's webOS, iOS and Android. Even the Wall Street Journal is throwing down headlines like "iPhone users eat chicken, Android prefer more ribs". Who's more affluent, Blackberry or iPhone users? Who visits Youngstown, Ohio more, Motorola Droid users or HTC Evo Droid users? Who downloads the most apps per month? Who prefers Nikes over Pumas?

All of this is naturally very interesting...until we hit sex. Then unfortunately, the numbers become so unbelievable that it calls into question all of our previous assumptions about Android users loving more pork-bellies and iPhone users having a significant Disneyland over Disneyworld preference. Check out the okCupid's sexual partner distribution that got so much press in early August if you don't believe me.

I'm a fairly conservative married man and even I find these numbers preposterous. Am I really supposed to believe that the average male Android user has had only 6 sexual partners by the age of 30? They must have meant to write 20, no? Without doing an official census of my male Android user friends, I could say that just my empirical fly-on-the-wall observations of them leaving parties with girls (without knowing their romantic lives-nontangent to me) would put them at nearly an order of magnitude above this six.

The numbers, in case you weren't so inclined as to click the link above are Android (M:6.0; W:6.1), BlackBerry (M:8.1, W:8.8) and iPhone (M:10, W:12.3). Seriously. You know I may live in decadent Manhattan but those figures seem to me like 24-36-month figures and not lifetime. That a on-the-go-young-professional female Blackberry user has 3 partners a year, I could see that, that she's had 8.8 in her entire life? Please, she probably had 8.8 her first two years as an undergrad.

I don't mean for this to be a naughty, dirty post, I just find that the sexual partner numbers are so seemingly fraudulent that I'm finding it hard to swallow all these favorite-bank-by-OS and shopping-habit-by-OS analytics.

Somebody call Dr. Kinsey on this one!

Thursday, September 16, 2010

You Want to Watch Some Robots Footage?!?!?!

Run Robot Run!

Beck Music Video with the Hondo Robots

Honda's Violin-bot

Rubix Cubot

Chinese Checkers Beastbot

PackBot en Accion

Great Tech Stories of the Day

Exoskeletons

Yahoo Thinks it's Rocky

A partir del 17 de septiembre

Take that Crapberry

Galaxy Tab Anyone?

Dell, a Monster of Innovation

I'm not going to deny that Dell makes some horrible products from subpar parts on a very often kind of basis. I'm not going to deny that at times Dell has been the consummate boring consumer tech company. I'm not even going to try to convince you to like Dell.

What does grind my gears though, is that nobody in tech journalism seems to be giving credit where credit is due to good old Dell on their aggressive tablet moves. Apple dropped the bomb, I know, I was there on 59th Street that fateful morning in April. I've seen the iPads rise out of nothingness and begin attempting ubiquity (in places Manhattan and San Francisco at least).

While the iPad is just a beast of entertainment, a great form factor, a beautiful machine, a long lasting battery, a heaven for gamers and a wonderful e-reader (contrary to what random women sporting Kindles poolside at beach resorts are going to tell you) you've got to really appreciate Dell for even showing up to the battle.

This year I've heard big things about the Cisco Cius, BlackPad (can anybody say Ewww? [by the way all you banksters and old folks out there, in case you didn't know, young people hate the Crapberry and everything it represents]), the Motorola Droid tablet, HP's stable of Android, webOS and Windows tablets that never come to fruition, the theoretical Verizon Chrome tablet and of course the mythical dual-screen Courrier.

Curiously, the only tablets I see actually hitting reality are those by Dell. Of course it's been years now that they're shipping the Latitude XT2, a primitive Windows-based machine for the Ancient Sumerian in all of us who just can't get enough of the stylus but I'm not talking about that.

I'm talking about the Dell Streak, five inches of Smartphone...er, tablet....er, maybe it is a Smartphone....or a tablet pleasure. The Dell Streak, whatever it is, is the most massive thing on the market you can make a phone call with, access the Android Market and be the envy of everyone on the 6 train with. I've personally been gigantically excited about this device (the idea of it being out and about in society, not actually using it, of course, I don't do Dell) since big boy Mike Dell whipped it out in the snow way back when it was called the Mini 5.

And you know what? Since then people have moaned and groaned. People including me. It's a big smartphone. It's a little tablet. Walt Mossberg said it was like holding a waffle to your head. Well, Walt, that is one high performance waffle. Look, it might be ridiculous, it might be a weird form, it might even just plain suck but at the end of the day, it's been the only real iPad competition and I will take a concrete Dell slate that sucks over a million nonexistent Courriers any day of the week.

Of course that's not all. Dell's whipping out this netbook/tablet Win7 flipper, part of the Inspiron family, by year's end. Dual Core Atom Processor means you can write your C++ applications in PC form and then flip it around for some sick accelerometer tablet racecar action. This thing is sleak, slick and in keeping with the rest of the pretty-ass Inspiron family.

Dell may not be a mecca of innovation and Michael Dell might not be Steve Jobs, but I've sweated and I've dreamed and I've hoped for a tablet revolution all year and the only people executing my most fervent wish are Apple, and that's right, out of Round Rock, Texas, Dell Computers.

Get a Dell dude!!!!!!!

Welcome to the Future

Good evening folks,

Today I begin my blog, Daniel The Techonomista.

I am continually reading literature about the coming age in which Digital Natives are going to take over the world (and all of the social and economic repercussion of this). What I don't like about this literature is that none of it is written by people under thirty.

I hope you like robots, AI, Augmented Reality, tablet computers, the consumer electronics business, IT, social networks and web 2.0 in general as much as I do!

Bienvenidos al futuro!

Daniel The Techonomista

Monday, November 15, 2010

November 15th Newsies